The Rule of Law: The Academy Speaks

Listen Again: Optimism and its Role in Preserving Democracy

Tis the season!  Revisit this episode with Craig Peters, Partner at Altair Law in San Francisco. The conversation centers on optimism and its essential role in preserving democracy. Enjoy stories of three mentors who, despite overwhelming odds, held onto optimism as they worked to create lasting change. 

The Rule of Law is Under Attack. Now What?

In the Season 2 finale, Joe Tucker and Kate Shaw, Professor of Law at UPenn Carey Law, confront the state of the Rule of Law in an era of selective prosecution, retaliation against critics, and concealment from the courts. They assess the Supreme Court’s response, measure the damage already done, and underscore the urgent role lawyers must play now to defend meaningful justice.

The Difference Makers: How Lawyers Can Mitigate Burnout & Mental Health Issues

In this episode, Joe sits down with attorney and licensed psychotherapist Erica Grigg for a candid look at the strains of the legal profession, from long hours to traumatic cases to mounting political pressure. They make the case for mental wellness alongside ethics and effectiveness, and share practical ways attorneys can support colleagues and themselves.

Democracy: A Worthwhile Work In Progress (Part 2)

In part two, Joe concludes his conversation with Antoinette Collignon on the Rule of Law and how U.S. leadership is seen abroad. Collignon notes Europe’s growing concern with the United States: some fear its commitment to democracy is only lip service, while others are alarmed by signs of alignment with Russia. She stresses the need for unity, respect, and strong alliances. Europe offers examples through the European Court of Human Rights, the European Union, and the closeness of history at its doorstep. Her message is clear: democracy survives only when allies stand together.

Democracy: A Worthwhile Work In Progress (Part 1)

In part one, Joe is joined by Antoinette Collignon, who offers a European perspective on democracy and the Rule of Law. She reflects on the European Court of Human Rights’ rulings in Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia and the downing of Flight MH17, marking an important victory for the families of those killed. Antoinette also shares her own family’s World War II survival story, underscoring why history, accountability, and vigilance remain essential to protecting human rights.

Justice and the Internet: Facts First

Joe sits down with lawyer and author Anne Bremner to examine how justice is shaped in an era of social media, 24/7 news, and viral narratives. Anne explains why jurors and the public often form opinions before trials begin, drawing on cases from Amanda Knox to Rebecca Zahau. She argues that while the public wants to be part of the conversation, lawyers have a responsibility to keep facts clear, accessible, and unbiased. The discussion makes the case for transparency, fact-based communication, and open access—so opinions are grounded in reality rather than distortion.

Democracy 2025: Does it Pass the Smell Test?

In this episode, Joe sits down with former Senator Jon Tester—author, co-host of the podcast Grounded, and a working Montana farmer—to take stock of the Rule of Law today. They examine how Congress is failing both the nation and the law, and flag troubling shifts in U.S. alliances. Together they ask: Where are we now? The conversation explores why transparency and accountability must be strengthened to protect the future of democracy. Tester also weighs in on America’s misunderstanding of tariffs and policy, and the empty promises and blatant lies coming from the current administration.
Listen to Jon Tester on the Grounded Podcast. 

Power, False Transparency & The Path to Justice: Part 4

In Part Four, Joe concludes his conversation with attorney Brad Edwards, who spent more than twenty years fighting to hold Jeffrey Epstein accountable while Epstein and his team worked tirelessly to cover up his crimes. Brad highlights how government agencies lied, violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, and enabled the cover-up to persist. He makes clear why survivors—and the American public—must demand transparency and honesty from the Department of Justice, and why anything less is a betrayal of justice.

Power, False Transparency & The Path to Justice: Part 3

In Part Three, Joe is joined by attorneys Jack Scarola and Brad Edwards. They recount how Epstein’s decision to sue Brad proved a tactical error that turned the tables. Jack and Brad reflect on their shared battles in court, the resilience of the survivors, and what it takes to stand up against power, intimidation, and systematic cover-ups. They also share their views on the DOJ, explaining why its actions don’t pass the smell test and amount to a disservice to survivors and to the Rule of Law itself.

Power, False Transparency & The Path to Justice: Part 2

In Part Two, Joe continues his conversation with attorney Jack Scarola, who spent decades working to hold Jeffrey Epstein accountable. They examine Epstein’s legal tactics, the arrogance that convinced him he was above the law, and the ways he manipulated the courts to intimidate others. Scarola reflects on his representation of Brad Edwards and how their case became a turning point in the Epstein saga, and he shares his perspective on the so-called “interrogation” of Ghislaine Maxwell.